The top three municipalities are those that have a notable ageing
demographic and have also received considerable pressure to embrace
urban consolidation. Ku-ring-gai, Hornsby and Warringah municipalities
are embracing the “ageing in place” mantra. A large proportion
of SEPP 5 activity is in established localities indicating that the
intention of the policy is being achieved. The
majority of SEPP 5 developments contained between 5 to 20 units
per development and most municipalities averaged less than 10
units per development. This indicates that SEPP 5 is taking the
place
of smaller “urban infill” projects which may not have
been undertaken if the policy was not in place. The
only municipality that bucked this trend was Randwick with
the Prince Henry, Little Bay subdivision and development. Most
developers who undertake SEPP 5 developments are small local
builders predominantly servicing one municipality. The largest
developer of SEPP 5 projects is the Department of Housing.
The Department of Housing accounted
for over 700 units across 60 developments within New South
Wales. This equates to over 17 percent of total SEPP 5 developments.
These developments ranged across the Sydney basin and New
South
Wales with no discernable location pattern. The
dominant role that the Department of Housing is taking in
SEPP 5 development is an indication of how strongly the New
South Wales Government is embracing the Commonwealth Government’s “ageing
in place” policy.
SEPP 5 development is leading to “naturally
occurring retirement communities” rather than planned retirement
village complexes. However it still has a lot to do with local government
planning and politics issues rather than projecting how and where retirees
want to live. |